Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 13

Thread: Good game design

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    3,429

    Default Good game design

    I want to make this thread about good game design, because I´m interested in game design, and I think many of the differences i have with many people there is that we do not see sight to sight on what is optimal game design. Now, people make a lot the logic fallacy of authority. If they read it from an actual designer instead of the dense guy in the forums people inmediatly give it a lot more credit.

    So I will start to bring subjects in this thread about game design, specially articles and lets talk about it.
    I decided o start with the left foot though and bring a mark rosewater comment. I say this because while I think that while Mark rosewater is a good game designer in some sense, he is also full of crap. He has to defend a monetization system that has no defense other than, we want to make money at the cost of hurting game quality.
    He has used though in an article the best defense possible. ¨But if we make more money, we can spend more money to improve the game!¨ which is....not a bad argument, but I´m not gonna talk about it now. I will present his article

    http://magic.wizards.com/en/articles.../metamorphosis
    Magic is, at its core, a game about change. I believe the reason that Magicis as healthy as it is (and has lasted as long as it has) stems from the fact that R&D accepts that Magic is an ever-evolving system. We don't fight change but rather allow it to be a tool that lets the game constantly reinvent itself. We use this as an opportunity to keep making Magic better and better.

    That´s how the article start and I strongly agree. Magic has changed made changes to his rulebooks like basically every year. In some cases the changes were HUGE. And I think that was key for the success of MTG. Specially in the first 2 years of magic, and Ive been there since Visions, the amount of changes to the game was DRASTIC.

    So when people are against ¨game changing¨ it gets on my nerves.
    Last edited by Waterd; 09-30-2014 at 01:38 PM.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    2,800

    Default

    Just a question, would this thread be better suited to the Other Games section of the forum?
    Relax and enjoy your shoes.

    I LIKE TAU! is Oldin the Boring in The 12 Masks of the Summoner
    I LIKE TAU! was Bálđur the Scholar in The Great Marsh. Life. Don't talk to me about life.

    Check out VASSAL, the free online SW program! We are always looking for more players, so learn how to use it here.
    Quote Originally Posted by Waterd View Post
    Im with I like tau on this one!

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    3,429

    Default

    Maaaaybbeeee, like My idea was about how the articles im gonna post applies to Summoner wars. But......I wouldn´t mind either if a mod consider to move it to other games.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Raleigh, NC, USA
    Posts
    2,261

    Default

    Well, Magic is also a system where due to the blind purchase model and power creep, the game balance is pretty awful, so is MtG really a game we want Summoner Wars to emulate?
    Last edited by prometheuslkr; 10-02-2014 at 02:03 PM.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    3,429

    Default

    Yes, we want summoner wars to emulate the good things of Magic. Which is becoming better, be willing to embrace change for improvement. (strongly supporting the competitive community is something else we want SW to emulate)

    Having older cards become obsolete is a very very small problem.

    Having said that Magic release cards that are obsolete as soon as it hits the market, and are intended to be so. Which is a MTG problem and I would like not SW to emulate that.

    Also SW has cards that did become obsolete really quick.
    Phoenix elves Archers and tundra orcs fighters are two of the earliest examples. If you ask me they were obsolete on release. (the right move were to get second deck, get 10 Warriors, and then place whatever in the remaining spots since they were gonna be built as magic 99% of the time)
    However Is ok when cards turn out to be too weak to play because playtesting or design mistake. MTG does it on purpose, which is terrible.

    I think lack of desire to improve is sinking SW on it´s own weight. They are right now imo surviving on what I said life support, if they want to keep alive they need to keep releasing content non stop, but if they are unwilling to change for the better, is only a matter of time where the death line arrives even with all the influx of new content trying to hook new players in with the whole ¨Hey new stuff for ya¨ That, as I´ve seen in other games, is enough to survive a little more in the short term(few years), but with ONLY that, long term is just not enough.

    In fact I think SW success limit itself a lot because that lack of change as I said many times before.
    I find sad though many SW players around have expressed that they want SW to remain only a niche.
    Last edited by Waterd; 10-02-2014 at 02:14 PM.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    2,800

    Default

    I think old cards becoming obselete in SW is quite a large problem, relatively. Hence why designers are avoiding it.
    Relax and enjoy your shoes.

    I LIKE TAU! is Oldin the Boring in The 12 Masks of the Summoner
    I LIKE TAU! was Bálđur the Scholar in The Great Marsh. Life. Don't talk to me about life.

    Check out VASSAL, the free online SW program! We are always looking for more players, so learn how to use it here.
    Quote Originally Posted by Waterd View Post
    Im with I like tau on this one!

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    3,429

    Default

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-igrqyssllk
    This is a great video about LOL monetization, for anyone interested in design and developing of games.
    A relevant part to SW is how They talk riot decided to minimize expenditure of advertising of the game and decide that most of it´s advertising to be done through promotion of their competitive events. Basically boosting tournaments, since they considered is more money efficent way to promote their games. This comes to the talk of the value of appeal to competitive players, even when they are a very small percentage of your gaming population

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    3,429

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Earth
    Posts
    2,039

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Waterd View Post
    This guy's reasoning is very sound, but it is not anything new (which doesn't in any way impact how right he is). It's essentially the reasoning behind any sort of VP system in wargames. Hell, it's the reason why I won't play any wargames without a VP system. And no, I don't consider SW to be a wargame - it's a mix between that and a card game, a sort of pseudo-wargame, with different characteristics. Anyway, VPs encourage aggression, particularly when they are based off of occupying an area that is much closer to your enemy's (starting area/summon spot/whatever) then to you. BattleLore 2.0 does a great job of this with both a vanilla VP system that is very encouraging of aggression, and scenario-specific objectives that give you extra VP, firepower, or other bonuses for occupying large amounts of enemy space. Summoner Wars main flaw (and IMO, 1 of only 2 really relevant flaw that needs fixing), is that it has some inevitability, but has just too little in order to make excessive turtling a possibility. SW's inevitability stems from the simple small size of the board in relation to how far unit's can move and attack, as well as the fact that you can summon units very close to your enemy's lines, or even on top of them. That leads me to problem 2, Etch/Rune Mages, that fix problem 1, but destroy aggressive wall placement, the main instigator of aggression in SW.
    Marek is LOVE. Marek is LIFE.

    3 rules of SW:

    1. Marek is perfect.

    2. Marek is the best Summoner ever.

    3. Marek will troll the everliving crap out of you.

    "If you can't blow them away with your brilliance, baffle them with your bullshit." -Marek (probably).
    Member of the unofficial PHG debate team. (Officially endorsed by Marek.)

  10. #10

    Default

    Excuse me, call me dumb but what is "VP System"?

    Its the first time I heard about it being talked relating to game designs.
    I play chess using boulders on a slope.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •